Tax deducting your MBA (for Belgian tax payers)

20.07.09 Posted by MBA Solvay under Financing, Grants and Scholarships10 comments

I just had an interesting talk with the accountant of MBA Solvay about the possibility of deducting the cost of the MBA from taxes. He has explained that it can be done, but that there is no general rule that can be applied, and stressed that you should always speak with your accountant to understand if and how it could be done in your case.

If you are employed and would like to deduct the cost of the MBA from your taxes you can do so as long as the content of the MBA is directly linked to your current job and profession, it has to be needed for your job. Together with the invoice, you should attach a letter with your tax form explaining why is it necessary for your current job: you have to prove it is needed to keep or maintain your current job, not to change jobs nor to get a promotion.

If you are a freelancer (independant) you can deduct it as an expense, as the knowledge you get is directly relevant.

Companies paying the MBA for their employees can also deduct the bill as an expense.

But remember, always check with your accountant to see if and how you can deduct it from your taxes.

Share and promote this post:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Wikio
  • Turn this article into a PDF!
  • Print this article!

Add a comment

Comments »

  1. I must say this is a great article i enjoyed reading it keep the good work :)

    Comment by Mike Harmon — July 20, 2009 @ 10:00 am

  2. Thank you Mike. Looking forward to your comments in the blog.

    Comment by MBA Solvay — July 20, 2009 @ 5:13 pm

  3. Great article on a great subject! Just a word of caution though: it is correct that you’re totally at the mercy of the tax man’s judgement. When I entered my tax forms, the MBA deduction was rejected. Even a letter from our CEO stating this was required for my job didn’t suffice.
    Talk about equal treatment of people!

    Comment by Carl Fransman — July 21, 2009 @ 2:38 pm

  4. I managed to get it but keep in mind, as stated in the post, that Belgian tax laws wants to offer you protection from loosing your job not to get a better paid job ;-)

    It will ALWAYS be rejected at first by the tax man. Don’t be shy and answer back that you disagree with his point of view and require him to reconsider. Don’t hesitate to ask for an appointement.

    There are three legal points that you should cite
    1) Question in the parliament (setting the scene)
    2) Two court decisions (deduction approved)

    It is in Dutch. I could not find it in French. (Use Google Translate for a rough translation ;-) )

    I think the school should provide a standard letter covering the different points to help foreign students working in Belgium with this request.


    VRAAG 00/377
    Vraag nr. 377 van de heer Eerdekens dd. 31.05.2000
    Vr. en Antw., Kamer, 2000-2001, nr. 70, blz. 7912-7913
    Bull. nr. 816, pag. 1282
    Studiekosten – Verband met beroep
    VRAAG
    Inzake het beroepsmatig karakter van uitgaven die een belastingplichtige
    heeft gedaan om aan cursussen, stages of seminaries deel te nemen, eist de
    administratie dat er een verband bestaat tussen die uitgaven en de
    beroepsactiviteit die door de betrokkene op het ogenblik van de feiten
    wordt uitgeoefend (Commentaar op de inkomstenbelastingen, nr. 52209).

    In verscheidene arresten wordt dat standpunt echter betwist.

    1. Doet het feit dat die studies worden aangevat in de hoop promotie
    te maken het verband met de beroepsactiviteit zoals die op dat
    ogenblik wordt uitgeoefend, teniet?

    2. Is dat standpunt van de administratie geen hinderpaal voor sommige
    belastingplichtigen die een opleiding willen volgen of zich verder
    willen bekwamen?

    3. Moet de administratie haar standpunt terzake niet herzien?

    4. Zal een circulaire worden opgesteld met het oog op een versoepeling
    terzake?

    ANTWOORD
    Ik heb de eer het geachte lid mee te delen dat de belastingplichtigen
    krachtens de bepalingen van artikel 49 van het Wetboek van de
    Inkomstenbelastingen 1992, als werkelijke beroepskosten kunnen aftrekken,
    de verantwoorde kosten die zij in het belastbare tijdperk hebben gedaan of
    gedragen om hun belastbare beroepsinkomsten te verkrijgen of te behouden.

    In die gedachtengang kunnen de kosten voor het volgen van cursussen, stages, opleidingen, onderwijs, seminaries, congressen slechts van de beroepsinkomsten worden afgetrokken voor zover zij rechtstreeks verband houden met de beroepswerkzaamheid die de belastingplichtige op het tijdstip
    van de feiten uitoefent.

    Wanneer die cursussen en opleidingen daarentegen verband houden met een
    afzonderlijk vak of een nieuwe beroepswerkzaamheid, vormen de
    desbetreffende kosten geen beroepskosten, maar moeten ze onder de uitgaven
    van persoonlijke aard, bedoeld in artikel 53, 1°, WIB 1992, worden
    gerangschikt.

    Hoe dan ook, komt het in eerste instantie aan de taxatieambtenaar toe om het nodige onderscheid te maken met inachtneming van de elementen in feite en in rechte, eigen aan elk geval.

    Overigens wil ik aanstippen dat dit administratief standpunt in overeenstemming is met de rechtspraak die de hoven terzake over het algemeen volgen.

    De administratie zal niettemin opnieuw onderzoeken of het nodig is om de
    bestaande richtlijnen terzake te verduidelijken of te vervolledigen.

    ——————————————-
    Arrest 1

    HOF VAN BEROEP TE GENT – Arrest van 18 december 2001 – Rol nr 1995/FR/135
    - Aanslagjaar 1990
    Context : Inkomstenbelastingen : Algemene voorwaarden toepasselijk op de
    beroepskosten

    Aftrekbaarheid van studiekosten als bedrijfslasten.

    Samenvatting

    Arrest van het Hof van Beroep van Gent dd. 18.12.2001 – De belastingplichtige had een arbeidscontract met een bank.Tijdens de duur van dit arbeidscontract met de bank heeft de belastingplichtige studies
    aangevat voor het behalen van een MBA-diploma. Vervolgens werd het
    arbeidscontract met de bank beëindigd en werd hij tewerkgesteld bij een
    andere werkgever. Volgens de Administratie mag hij deze met voormelde studies gepaard gaande kosten niet in aftrek nemen als bedrijfslasten van zijn personenbelasting omdat het genomen initiatief van de
    belastingplichtige om deze scholing te volgen op het beginmoment geen verband hield met de latere werkgever. Het Hof stelt vast dat de studiekosten rechtstreeks verband houden met de uitoefening van het beroep van de belastingplichtige bij de bank, dat de studies werden gedaan in de
    periode dat hij werkelijk in dienst was van de bank en deze op verzoek van
    de bank werden uitgevoerd. Hij heeft de studies gevolgd om zijn beroep op
    deskundigere en professionele wijze te kunnen uitoefenen. De studiekosten
    mogen dan ook in aftrek worden genomen omdat ze werden gedaan i.v.m. het
    uitgeoefend beroep teneinde belastbare inkomsten te verkrijgen of te
    behouden.

    ——————————————-
    arrest 2

    Hof van Beroep te Gent – Arrest van 15/03/2001 – Zaak Nr 1993/FR/4400 -
    Aanslagjaren 1989 en 1990

    Studiekosten

    Samenvatting

    Belastingplichtige volgt een managementopleiding. De hiervoor gemaakte
    kosten wil zij als beroepskosten aftrekken. De fiscale administratie verwerpt deze kosten daar zij volgens haar geen verband houden met het beroep van eiseres. Doch uit het administratief onderzoek blijkt dat de
    werkgever zijn personeel aanmoedigt bijkomende cursussen te volgen gezien
    de zeer snelle evolutie van alle maatschappelijke, wetenschappelijk en
    technische gegevens in het beroepsleven. Juist deze leidinggevende functie nopen haar ertoe studies te volgen voor het verkrijgen van hogere functies of promoties, met hogere verdiensten en dus met als gevolg meer inkomsten.

    Het Hof is dan ook de mening toegedaan dat de kosten in verband met de cursus terecht in mindering worden gebracht zodat ze als beroepskosten worden aangemerkt.

    Comment by Albero Fernandez Fernandez — August 3, 2009 @ 10:33 am

  5. Thanks a lot Alberto. I will discuss it with the accountant.

    Ramón

    Comment by MBA Solvay — August 3, 2009 @ 11:01 am

  6. Thank you Alberto, that’s exactly the right procedure; just make sure to cover one more caveat though – your current employer’s (for those in PT) HR-department should be made aware that when called by the tax-office, they do confirm you need this MBA to keep up with your job responsibilities and not state that you need this in order to make promotion (in which case the tax deduction does not apply!).

    Comment by Carl Fransman — August 3, 2009 @ 3:30 pm

  7. The deduction of tuition fee as business expenses in Belgium. The following is a general summary of the Belgian tax treatment of the MBA tuition fee. It is based on the tax laws, regulations and administrative interpretations currently applicable in Belgium.
    The following summary does not take into account or discuss the tax laws of any country other than Belgium, nor does it take into account the individual circumstances of each participant to the MBA. Prospective participant should consult their own advisers as to the Belgian and foreign tax treatment of MBA tuition fee.

    In Belgium, MBA tuition fees may, prima facie, be typical business expenses if their purpose is to allow taxpayers to improve their training and thereby retain their remuneration or acquire new professional income.

    Administration and Jurisprudence allow the deductibility of such business expenses as professional expenses according to Article 49 of ITC 92 to the extent that such expenses comply with certain conditions.

    The Administrative Commentary sates in its number 52/209 that the professional – or personal – character of expenditures incurred by a taxpayer to attend courses, workshops or seminars (e.g. registration fee, right of participation to exams, travel expenses, books, syllabus, etc..) depends of the relationship between these expenditures and the professional activity exercised by the person at that time.

    Indeed, there is to make a distinction depending on whether fees courses, workshops or seminars are:

    - Directly related to the professional activity performed by the person at the moment where courses are monitored and which are necessitated by technological advances of this activity: such costs can be deducted as business expenses;

    - In connection with an independent branch or a new business: these expenses are not deductible because they have to be ordered as part of personal expenditures, pursuant by article 53, 1 ° of ITC 92.

    In other words, Administration allows the deductibility of tuition fees when three conditions are met:

    1° Courses monitored are directly related to the professional activity;
    2° The professional activity which is taken into account is the one performed at the moment where expenses are engaged; and
    3° Tuition fees are necessary because of technological advances in such activity.

    Jurisprudence admits these criteria but is much more flexible to the extent that its intervention is limited to the verification of the direct link between tuition fees and the professional activity.

    Furthermore, courts have tendency to interpret with flexibility this direct link between education fees and professional activity.

    For instance, Court of Gent allowed a tax employee to deduct from its professional incomes lessons expenses that he took at the ‘Fiscale Hogeschool’, notwithstanding the fact that his employer gave him credit hour .

    Court of Antwerp allowed the deductibility of MBA tuition fee insofar as the employee demonstrated via certificates from the employer that it was necessary to take lessons both for the immediate exercise of its activity and for the functions that he might have in the near future .

    Recently, the Belgian ruling commission decided that all “MBA” expenses (registration fee, transportation costs, study costs, the rent of an apartment, insurance costs and hospitalization costs) are deductible as business expenses according to article 49 ITC 92 to the extent that the fact of following the training is directly linked with the professional activity and contributes to the acquisition of a better professional capability for acquiring higher professional incomes .

    By consequence, Solvay MBA students who are Belgium residents would be allowed to deduct tuition fee from their incomes as business expenses to the extent that they can prove that such MBA is directly linked with their professional activity. However, we advise that each case is taken with a personal tax advisor.

    In tax matters, the above analysis does not present any guarantee for future acceptance of the deduction.

    Comment by Chiara B. — August 3, 2009 @ 7:29 pm

  8. Unbelievably the answer;)

    Comment by closeknitfriend — September 2, 2009 @ 9:18 pm

  9. Same neighbourly post but there are some nub where I resolve not agree. But blanket its altogether good.

    Comment by Vigrx Plus — October 26, 2009 @ 4:26 am

  10. So as far as I understand I can deduct MBA cost from my tax even if I’m a freelancer? But what if I’m not a Belgian? Is it still possible? Anyway, it’s really good to know. Thank you

    Comment by ProSolution pill review — January 29, 2010 @ 11:06 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Blog by email

Don't forget to click the link in the confirmation email!

Recent Comments

  • evision: http://www.sangambayard-c-m.co m
  • evision: http://www.sangambayard-c-m.co m
  • Ramon Suarez: Thank you for posting the picture :) It was great to spend the morning with Chiara talking to possible...
  • One year MBA program: This blog is really helpful for those who want to join MBA program..May I know whats the...
  • Chiara: Morece, of course you can apply to the MBA programme, wherever you are coming from! Apply online through:...